Gone concern: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Create page.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add links.) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
A basis of valuation or other financial assessment which assumes discontinuance of the bank (or other undertaking) being assessed. | ''Valuation - financial reporting - risk management - prudential regulation - capital adequacy.'' | ||
A basis of valuation or other financial assessment, which assumes discontinuance of the bank (or other undertaking) being assessed. | |||
The gone concern concept is important in bank prudential regulation and capital requirements. | |||
To be fully effective as loss absorbing capacity, capital should absorb losses when the entity is still a going concern (and not yet a 'gone concern'). | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
*[[Capital]] | |||
*[[Capital adequacy]] | |||
*[[Discontinuance]] | |||
*[[Financial reporting]] | |||
*[[GCLAC]] | |||
*[[Going concern]] | *[[Going concern]] | ||
*[[ | *[[Loss absorbing capacity]] | ||
*[[Prudential regulation]] | |||
*[[Risk management]] | |||
*[[Total Loss Absorbing Capacity]] | |||
*[[Valuation]] | |||
[[Category: | [[Category:Compliance_and_audit]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:09, 2 June 2021
Valuation - financial reporting - risk management - prudential regulation - capital adequacy.
A basis of valuation or other financial assessment, which assumes discontinuance of the bank (or other undertaking) being assessed.
The gone concern concept is important in bank prudential regulation and capital requirements.
To be fully effective as loss absorbing capacity, capital should absorb losses when the entity is still a going concern (and not yet a 'gone concern').
