Hybrid mismatch arrangement: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Update links.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Mend link.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
* [[Hybrid entity]] | * [[Hybrid entity]] | ||
* [[Multinational corporation/company]] | * [[Multinational corporation/company]] | ||
* [[ | * [[Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development]] (OECD) | ||
* [[Tax avoidance]] | * [[Tax avoidance]] | ||
* [[Transfer pricing]] | * [[Transfer pricing]] | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
==Other resources== | |||
*[[Media:BEPS_report_2013.pdf|OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting 2013]] | *[[Media:BEPS_report_2013.pdf|OECD Action Plan on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting 2013]] | ||
Latest revision as of 13:01, 25 June 2022
Tax.
A hybrid mismatch arrangement is an arrangement:
- Intended to secure a tax advantage within a multinational group
- Resulting from a difference in tax treatment of the same financial instrument or entity between different jurisdictions.
Hybrid mismatch arrangements can arise both from hybrid financial instruments and from hybrid entities.
Following OECD and G20 initiatives in relation to tax base erosion and profit shifting, the UK introduced anti-hybrid tax rules, effective from 2017.
See also
- Base erosion and profit shifting
- Business in Europe: Framework for Income Taxation
- CbC reporting
- Corporation Tax
- Diverted profits tax
- Double taxation
- Fixed ratio method
- G20
- Hybrid
- Hybrid capital
- Hybrid entity
- Multinational corporation/company
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD)
- Tax avoidance
- Transfer pricing
- Worldwide interest cap
