Restitution: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Administrator (CSV import) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Add quote - source - The Treasurer online - 6 May 2022 - https://www.treasurers.org/hub/treasurer-magazine/esg-led-litigation-and-what-it-means-for-treasurers) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The legal principle that where a person has benefited undeservedly at another's expense, that person may be required to restore any improper benefit | ''Law.'' | ||
The legal principle that where a person has benefited undeservedly at another's expense, that person may be required to restore any improper benefit obtained. | |||
:<span style="color:#4B0082">'''''ESG litigants not seeking financial restitution'''''</span> | |||
:"The main risks to issuers from the rising incidence of ESG-related litigation are not financial but strategic and operational, as many ESG lawsuits seek structural changes in business practice rather than financial restitution." | |||
:''The Treasurer online - 6 May 2022.'' | |||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[ESG]] | |||
* [[Issuer]] | |||
* [[Law]] | |||
* [[Litigation]] | |||
* [[Rescission]] | * [[Rescission]] | ||
[[Category:Compliance_and_audit]] | |||
Latest revision as of 12:29, 14 June 2022
Law.
The legal principle that where a person has benefited undeservedly at another's expense, that person may be required to restore any improper benefit obtained.
- ESG litigants not seeking financial restitution
- "The main risks to issuers from the rising incidence of ESG-related litigation are not financial but strategic and operational, as many ESG lawsuits seek structural changes in business practice rather than financial restitution."
- The Treasurer online - 6 May 2022.
