Sticky: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Create the page. Source: Global Capital web article http://www.globalcapital.com/article/jbx52tkcb8l0/the-battle-for-sticky-deposits) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Classify page.) |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
* [[Funding]] | * [[Funding]] | ||
* [[Retail]] | * [[Retail]] | ||
* [[Stability]] | |||
* [[Stress]] | * [[Stress]] | ||
[[Category:Accounting,_tax_and_regulation]] | |||
[[Category:The_business_context]] | |||
[[Category:Identify_and_assess_risks]] | |||
Latest revision as of 11:45, 2 July 2022
Bank funding.
Deposits and other sources of bank funding are considered 'sticky' if they are likely to be renewed or rolled over by the customer as part of the bank's funding, including under conditions of stress.
Retail customers' current accounts are often relatively sticky.
