Transaction risk analysis: Difference between revisions
From ACT Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
imported>Doug Williamson (Create page. Sources: The Treasurer online June 2019 and EPSM webpage https://www.epsm.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2019-07-10-EPSM-%E2%80%93-Overview-on-SCA-for-Further-Discussion-v1.0-1.pdf?iframe=true) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Update final sentence.) |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
If the | If the issuer agrees, the individual card-based payment or credit transfer can be exempted from Strong Customer Authentication. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[3D Secure]] | * [[3D Secure]] | ||
* [[Credit transfer]] | |||
* [[Issuer]] | * [[Issuer]] | ||
* [[Payment service provider]] | * [[Payment service provider]] | ||
Revision as of 09:45, 22 July 2019
Payments - PSD2 - Strong customer authentication (SCA) exemptions.
(TRA).
Transaction risk analysis is an exemption to the requirement for Strong Customer Authentication under PSD2.
Under the TRA exemption, a transaction can be flagged as a low-risk-transaction if:
- the fraud rate of the related payment service provider (PSP) is below a certain threshold, and
- a real time analysis has not revealed any risk.
If the issuer agrees, the individual card-based payment or credit transfer can be exempted from Strong Customer Authentication.
