Cap: Difference between revisions
imported>Doug Williamson (Link with qualifications page.) |
imported>Doug Williamson (Align with qualifications material.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
1. | 1. | ||
An option which effectively establishes a maximum worst case hedged rate or price for a cash outflow or a liability, while allowing the holder of the cap to retain the potential benefit of more favourable lower market rates or prices. | |||
In the case of a commodity, the cap would be a call option over the commodity. | |||
2. | |||
The hedged expense profile achieved by the combination of a cap option with the underlying exposure. | |||
3. | |||
A risk management arrangement whereby limits are placed on the positions that participants in an interbank funds transfer system can incur during the business day. | A risk management arrangement whereby limits are placed on the positions that participants in an interbank funds transfer system can incur during the business day. | ||
| Line 11: | Line 19: | ||
Sender net debit limits may be either collateralised or uncollateralised. | Sender net debit limits may be either collateralised or uncollateralised. | ||
== See also == | == See also == | ||
* [[call]] | |||
* [[Capped FRN]] | * [[Capped FRN]] | ||
* [[Collar hedge]] | * [[Collar hedge]] | ||
Revision as of 08:49, 1 August 2015
1.
An option which effectively establishes a maximum worst case hedged rate or price for a cash outflow or a liability, while allowing the holder of the cap to retain the potential benefit of more favourable lower market rates or prices. In the case of a commodity, the cap would be a call option over the commodity.
2.
The hedged expense profile achieved by the combination of a cap option with the underlying exposure.
3.
A risk management arrangement whereby limits are placed on the positions that participants in an interbank funds transfer system can incur during the business day.
They may be set by each individual participant or by the body governing the transfer system; they can be set in multilateral net, bilateral net or (less commonly) gross terms and can be either a credit cap or a debit cap; for example, bilateral net credit caps, set by an individual participant, will constitute a limit on the credit exposure which that participant will accept in relation to each other participant.
In contrast, sender net debit caps, which may for example be set by the governing body of the clearing system based on a particular formula, limit the aggregate value of transfers that an individual participant may send to all other participants over and above its incoming transfers.
Sender net debit limits may be either collateralised or uncollateralised.
